By Liz Cabrera/Pro Mosaico Humano
In our modern pursuit of love, we often fall into a specific, heavy trap: the expectation that one person—our partner—must be the sole provider of our emotional sustenance. We expect them to be our lover, our best friend, our financial partner, our co-parent, and our spiritual mirror. When they fail to meet every single one of these criteria simultaneously, we feel a void. We question the relationship.
But recently, as I sat with my own thoughts, I began to question the void itself.
Redefining “Boring” as Peace
I realized something profound about the quiet moments I used to resent. Perhaps what I was perceiving as “boring” in the past was actually just peace. It was the absence of drama and unnecessary noise.
We are often conditioned to mistake adrenaline for passion and chaos for importance. But when that external chatter is eliminated, and you are left with just you to deal with, the dynamic changes. You start accessing different parts of your mind and personas that you usually keep hidden—even from yourself.
When our day-to-day living conditions are filled with chores, demands, and other people’s drama, our cognitive bandwidth is hijacked. That alone is more than enough to keep the mind busy, leaving no room for creativity or creation. In that state, the human being simply becomes a consumer of events, rather than a creator of life.
This brings us to a difficult question, one I have wrestled with in my own writing:
Can a relationship be “good” if it lacks deep emotional connectivity?
There is a distinct value in being in situations that don’t rob you of your energy. A healthy relationship allows for balance—one where a partner carries their load without burdening the other. This creates stability. It creates a satisfying life in the physical, financial, and logistical realms.
Yet, a lingering question remains: If I am satisfied physically and financially, but not emotionally connected, how can that persist?
If we define intimacy strictly as a deep, constant soul-merging with our spouse, the lack of it feels like a failure. But perhaps the issue isn’t the relationship itself, but the paradigm through which we view it.
Cultivating Multiple Channels of Intimacy
If we view our lives as a mosaic—un mosaico humano—we see that a complete picture requires many different tiles.
If your partner provides safety, stability, and respect (the tile of “Foundation”), but perhaps lacks the ability to engage with your deepest existential questions (the tile of “Intellectual Spirit”), it does not necessarily mean the relationship is broken. It means that the “Intellectual Spirit” tile must be sourced from elsewhere.
Emotional intimacy does not have to be a monologue with one person; it can be a dialogue with the world. We can cultivate intimacy through multiple channels:
• Creative Intimacy: engaging with your art, writing, or movement to process your inner world.
• Intellectual Intimacy: seeking out mentors, communities, or peers who challenge your mind.
• Social Intimacy: nurturing friendships that offer the empathy or excitement a stable partner might not possess.
• Solitary Intimacy: using that newfound “boredom” (peace) to connect deeply with your own self, rather than looking for a partner to distract you from your own thoughts.
The Release
When we stop demanding that our partners be our “everything,” we release them from an impossible burden, and we release ourselves from the role of the disappointed consumer.
We can learn to see relationships differently: not as a single vessel that must hold all our water, but as one strong pillar in a larger structure. By diversifying where we get our emotional needs met, we protect our creativity. We allow the peace of a stable home to be the launching pad for our own internal exploration, rather than a cage of boredom.
The goal isn’t to settle for less connection, but to expand the definition of where connection lives.